Jump to content

EdLaFave

Members
  • Content Count

    831
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

0 Neutral

1 Follower

Contact Methods

  • Website URL
    https://educatorsfightingforfairness.wordpress.com

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    Orlando, Fl

Recent Profile Visitors

1,098 profile views
  1. EdLaFave

    NYAdmin

    You can basically use any institution you want. I have an all Vanguard portfolio so I opened mine with Vanguard. I believe some institutions charge fees if you buy another institution’s funds through them (again, not something I’ve had to deal with). The bogleheads have documented how to build a three fund portfolio with funds from various institutions. So the reason it takes a few hours per year to manage is because you need to keep those funds in the right proportion to each other. When your portfolio is small this means putting new money into the funds that are “low” and when your portfolio is large it means occasionally selling what you have too much or to buy what you have too little of. If you wanted to literally do nothing then a target date fund or a fixed allocation fund like Vanguard’s life strategy fund will handle that for you. Please read my blog post on investing in a marriage that hopefully will last, but may not. I wrote that before I got divorced and I’m happy it is something we considered. To answer your question directly, owning a fund in multiple accounts is fine, owning a fund in a single account is fine. That isn’t what matters. Let’s assume you won’t get divorced. You and your husband should decide on an asset allocation that works best for you two. You should view your entire portfolio as the summation of each account and buy funds in each account based on how cheap it is. Suppose everything in your husband’s 401k is expensive except bonds, you’d want to keep your bonds there (as much as possible), which would mean your other accounts would have to be more stock heavy in order to reach your overall desired asset allocation. ...if your husband has a bunch of funds that either means he is betting on specific sectors/asset classes, which I wouldn’t do, or his account is needlessly complicated, which I also wouldn’t do. It isn’t a huge sin, but it is something to consider.
  2. I’ll add more later, but yes, Fidelity and Vanguard are clearly the best vendors.
  3. Any word on when and how I can watch it from home? Maybe Netflix?
  4. To answer your question, yes, this is legal. Your employer can select and/or replace whatever vendor they want for a 403b. The same way they can swap out your insurance company every year. It is an employer sponsored plan; they’re in control. I suppose it is conceivable that a state or local government might voluntarily put restrictions on exactly how and if this is done, but that’s an area I can’t speak to. Your post was very short on details... 100% vesting for what? Employer match to your 403b? Pension? What? What was the vesting schedule? What do you mean they “dropped” your 403b vendor? They stopped new participants from using it? They stopped existing participants from continuing to use it? They forced existing participants to roll the account over to another vendor? What? Your post gives the impression that you worked at this job for a long time after the 403b was “dropped”. So what was happening to the contributions you were presumably making? Did they just stop? Did you not notice? Did they get diverted to another 403b? What?
  5. I just wanted to bump this thread because I think I found an error in my initial analysis (see the strikethrough text). I welcome group wisdom to try to get to the bottom of this.
  6. Sorry to hear that. Let me make sure I understand. Your wife worked at District A and contributed to a 403b. She left District A for District B and rolled over the 403b to District B's 403b and now she is contributing new money to District B's 403b. Is that right? Let's start with new contributions made to District B's 403b...I'm 100% sure you're not going to be able to roll that over to an IRA until a qualifying event happens (probably quitting or being fired). The rolled over funds may be a bit more complicated. I'd be willing to bet that it will be treated no differently than the new contributions, but I don't know that for an absolute fact. My current 401k (very different from the 403b world) allows me to roll money into the 401k and then roll it back out whenever I want. I suppose it is conceivable that some 403bs may allow the same thing, but I'm skeptical. You'll have to reach out to the vendor and/or read all of the fine print to know for sure. It's too bad you missed the opportunity to rollover the 403b from District A to an IRA after quitting, that would have been allowable. Finally, do you have a better vendor available in District B? You can roll EVERYTHING over to the better vendor if one is available.
  7. There are actually two companies named Lincoln and one of them offers a Participant Directed Plan (PDP) in limited areas of the country. Search the forms to find out if it's Lincoln Investment that offers the PDP plan (I think it is) and figure out if you have access to it. This thread may be a good starting point, I'll leave the homework up to you. If not, then ASPire is the best option on the list. I documented their plan here. It isn't as good as Vanguard or Fidelity, but it is reasonable enough, definitely worth using. I was able to get Vanguard and Fidelity added to my district's list of approved vendors and I'm happy to help you do it. Somebody recently asked me for general advice on the Bogleheads site and this is what I had to say. Reach out to me if you need help or insight to get the job done. You can do it. The other thing to consider is that some states have state sponsored 457b plans (for example, NY has a pretty good one). It is possible that is the best option. Either way, you're in good shape with ASPire being the "floor" of your options.
  8. Is there a reason you're asking what district is the "gold standard" as opposed to what a "gold standard" would look like? I certainly haven't reviewed every district in the nation, so I can't award a "gold standard". However, I can tell you what I would do if I were given complete control over a district: I'd have exactly one vendor for the 403b and one vendor for the 457b...neither would have agents. That vendor would offered fixed allocation funds (Vanguard LifeStrategy), target date funds, total domestic stock fund, total international stock fund, and a total bond fund. That's it. Every employee would be automatically enrolled, they'd have a "reasonable" percentage of their salary allocated towards it, and they'd be invested in a target date fund based on their age. Every employee would be able to override this automatic enrollment. My Retirement Services department would offer information very similar to what I've posted on my Investing 101 page. That is the gold standard, but I'm not aware of any districts that have implemented it.
  9. EdLaFave

    NYAdmin

    ...also, if you have access to a 457b, then take advantage of that too. You can put 19k in a 403b and another 19k in a 457b.
  10. EdLaFave

    NYAdmin

    I'm not sure how to break the tie between Vanguard and Fidelity. I'll let you decide. Vanguard is documented here. Fidelity is documented here. There may be corner cases where that is sub-optimal, but generally that is the right decision because you have total control over an IRA, whereas a 403b is up to the whims of your employer. I don't understand the question. I assume you're asking what type of account you should move your 200k (from an old employer's 403b) to? I think you've already answered your own question. Vanguard or Fidelity, pick what feels good to you. It is very common to use the word "Roth" as if it fully describes an account. It does not. Tax advantaged accounts (401k, 403b, 457b, IRA, etc.) come in two variants: Roth and Traditional. Please ask questions if you don't understand that. I assume you're asking if half of your 403b contribution can be Traditional and half can be Roth...yes that is allowable. Is it advisable? Well, you haven't provided enough information to say...again ask questions if that's what you're getting at. IRAs have income contribution limits whereas other tax advantaged accounts (401k, 403b, 457b) do not. Some people make too much to directly contribute to a Roth IRA. However, Congress wrote the law in a fairly ridiculous way that allows those folks to contribute to a Roth IRA indirectly through something that has come to be known as a "backdoor Roth contribution". You haven't told us much about you, so I can't answer that really. I think you're going to want to read my Investing 101 page. Your main decision is to decide what percentage of your portfolio should be in bonds. I personally do that by recognizing that stocks can drop by 50% fairly quickly and take many years to recover...then I ask myself how much of my portfolio I can financially and emotionally afford to lose. If you would do something foolish like selling stocks during a crash if you lost 50% of your portfolio then guess what, you can't handle a 100% stock portfolio. If you can only handle losing 25% of your portfolio then you need a 50% stock and 50% bond portfolio. Once you know what stock/bond split is appropriate for you (something only you can answer, by the way). Then picking the funds is easy. If you want to save a little bit of cash in fees then you invest in what's known as the 3 Fund Portfolio...if you don't mind paying a little extra to not have to manage anything at all (3 fund portfolio takes hours per year to manage) then you can go with an all-in-one fund (fixed allocation or target date). In the Vanguard/Fidelity links I gave you, I point out the funds to use. In the Investing 101 link I gave you, I describe all of this in detail. Ask questions. ...all my comments are in regard to your entire portfolio as a whole. Each account does not have to be a stand-alone portfolio if you will. Ask questions. Very generally speaking, it doesn't matter what account type you have, my fund recommendations will be the same. However, bond funds in a taxable account can generate "large" tax bills (especially for somebody in a high tax bracket). I'd also like to put my highest performing assets in the account that is guaranteed to never be taxed (Roth accounts) so I'd avoid putting bonds in those accounts (Roth). So there are exceptions to the rules, but I can't give comprehensive input because you haven't laid out your entire financial situation. It seems like you've really grabbed onto the idea that some funds are "better" in one type of account than others, but as a general rule of thumb (with a few caveats) that isn't how this works. You build a fully diversified portfolio with rock bottom costs (in short that means, you buy total market index funds). Then you buy those funds in the accounts where they're the cheapest and/or most tax efficient. You view your portfolio as the summation of all of those accounts. Yes, you apparently will spend money on your kids college, but it doesn't come from a single fund...it comes from your portfolio as a whole. You may do some mental accounting to imagine it coming from a particular source, but that's essentially a fallacy (one lots and lots of people fall into).
  11. Based on OCPS (FL), which I think is the same everywhere: AXA is documented here. Vanguard is documented here. If your state doesn’t have a great 457b then you’re also going to want to add a vendor for that too. Fidelity is the best, they’re documented here. I’m happy to help you reform your district’s plans. I’ve successfully done it in my district. You can navigate to my blog to read some of posts about it. I also answered a question about this over on a bogleheads thread. Reach out if you want help.
  12. You’re going to want to define terms. What is a straight average fee? Why do I care what the average participant fee is? Based on your post, I can’t tell, with any confidence, what you’d be paying at both vendors. Lincoln offers a cheap PDP plan in select areas. It is a good idea to list all available vendors because we might know something that you don’t. have you considered a 457b? Some states sponsor good plans even if your vendor list is bad.
  13. You can absolutely eliminate a vendor from the approved list. It has happened in many places. I’m not sure exactly how it happens. Are people forced to rollover their plan to a currently approved vendor? Are they allowed to keep the account but no longer contribute to it? Are they allowed to keep and contribute to the account, but no new accounts can be opened? Maybe the specifics are negotiated on a case by case basis, maybe each vendor has a policy, or maybe the school district has a policy. Let us know what you find. Be prepared to counter the argument that removing a bad vendor will be disruptive to employees and is thus a “bad” thing to do.
  14. I also want to add one more thing. The best solutions are the ones that don’t require ongoing effort and resources to maintain and enforce. That’s why eliminating exploítative vendors and starting auto enrollment is an absolute winner. Set it and forget it, if you will.
×
×
  • Create New...