Jump to content


  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

0 Neutral

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. I agree with the other guys, that your allocation is too stock heavy. I wouldn't go more aggressive than about 70/30 at age 48. Bonds often get a bad rap as being boring and low growth, but there are years when they will out perform stocks, and with a lot less risk. My bond fund is up 8.9% YTD!
  2. And over 50 catch up also increased from 6,000 to 6,500. Looks like IRA contribution limits are unchanged.
  3. Thanks for the feedback everyone. Just to be clear, this is not a presentation that I am making to any person or group. I just give my written concern to a union rep. and they bring it up to the superintendent in a meeting that is meant to be the first step in discussing issues of concern.
  4. We already have Vanguard and Fidelity as options, since 2015. We don't need any administration action. I just want to help my millennial colleagues get their act together.
  5. Thanks Tony, Our meet and confer suggestions are supposed to be non-confrontational suggestions to improve the school climate. I don't feel comfortable submitting a petition, because they always feel confrontational to me. I just want to raise awareness to the issue. Two years ago I sent a similar proposal and got positive response from both the union representative and our districts business manager, who both said they shared my concerns. At the time we had an interim superintendent who had a one year contract, and never responded. So I just want to basically raise awareness to the new Superintendent. Maybe I should leave out the part about signing the fiduciary responsibility? To me it just blows my mind that insurance salesman can just wander into our school and peddle their crap investment products. Why don't we just let car salesmen, time share, and Amway people in too.
  6. Please let me know if you see any factual inaccuracies.
  7. A couple of times a year our union representatives at my school district get together with the Superintendent for an event called "Meet and Confer" to discuss non contractual issues, grievances, concerns, etc. that employees can submit anonymously. Usually it involves things like supervision times, staff dress code, leaving the work place during working hours and things like that. I thought I would submit something about improving 403Bs. Please give honest and brutal feedback. I won't submit it to my union rep for a day or 2. If the graph on page 2 doesn't display, it is just the one from Dan and Scott's power point presentation provided for us on this site about why fees matter. Meet and Confer Topic November 2019 I submitted a similar topic a couple years ago, but since then we have had changes in the Superintendent position as well as union leadership, so I will throw it out there again. I would like to see Monticello become a leader in 403B reform at the K-12 level. This is an issue for thousands of school districts at the state and national level. The problem is that since its inception, almost 60 years ago, the K-12 403B market has been dominated by high priced and complicated insurance products usually called variable annuities, tax sheltered annuities, indexed annuities, etc. The salespeople that sell these products are allowed access to our buildings, often during school hours, calling themselves “financial advisors”, even though they have no fiduciary standard to follow and often no training or certification in financial planning. Unlike its cousin, the 401K, which is regulated by ERISA (Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974), K-12 403Bs are only regulated by the less rigorous insurance industry standards. As a result salesman push high priced, complicated insurance products on educators that limit their ability to effectively save for retirement. The biggest misconception that the insurance salespeople push is that you need an annuity to get the tax deferred benefit of the 403B. This is absolutely false. The 403B tax code itself allows for deferred income if the employer allows it. Purchasing an annuity within a 403B plan is expensive, redundant, and unnecessary. It’s akin to wearing a raincoat inside your house (double tax protection that you don’t need). The 403B(7) is the specific code for deferred income that can be invested directly in the underlying assets like mutual funds, bonds, CDs, etc., without the insurance wrap-around. This issue has been in the news again the last few weeks as the SEC (Securities and Exchange Commission) investigates the predatory sales tactics of the insurance industry directed at school employees. One of the companies under investigation is one of the most widely used and visibly present in the Monticello School district (see links below). The Barron’s article is shorter, https://www.barrons.com/articles/sec-looks-at-aigs-sales-of-annuities-to-teachers-51572426001 and the Wall Street Journal goes into more detail: https://www.wsj.com/articles/sec-launches-investigation-of-practices-in-retirement-plans-for-teachers-government-employees-11570651944 The price difference for the investor, between annuities and investing directly with a low cost vendor is staggering, with annuities often being 10-20 times the annual cost. I had an annuity product for many years that had expense ratios averaging over 2% (200 basis pts.) annually. Low priced vendors can give you the same exposure to investments but averaging only about 0.14% (14 basis pts). These fees are assessed every year on your entire account, not just on money going in. See chart below to see how fees make a huge difference over time. *The chart above, which compares the average variable annuity, to an actively managed fund, and an indexed fund, makes the following assumptions: 35 year career, $250 invested monthly ($125/pay period), and a 6% nominal return. If you contributed more than this small amount over your career the differences would be obviously much greater. So, what is the solution on the local level? The good news is that the Monticello School District does have some low cost vendors on our approved list that do offer non-annuitized options for employees. That is great, but I feel like we can do better. Here are some ideas that I have. 1. Explain and promote our great options at new teacher orientation. Let new teachers know that we have low cost options for tax deferral, since they are the ones most often targeted by insurances salespeople. 2. Cut down some of the names of insurance companies on our approved vendor list. Experts at 403Bwise.org (a non-profit organization) will tell you that more choices are not better for employee participation rate. 3. Put more restrictions on allowing salespeople into our building. Make them sign a fiduciary agreement, disclose all fees on their products (including commissions, load fees, expense ratios, and surrender charges), disclose their education and or certification that allows them to give financial advice. 4. Provide educational opportunities for current employees that maybe haven’t started savings, or that could use help switching from a high cost plan to a better option. Better retirement savings options are a benefit for employees, employers, and students. Financially secure employees are more satisfied employees that can retire sooner, ultimately saving the district money. Teachers that need to teach until full retirement age in their late 60’s probably don’t benefit students, and certainly cost the district more in terms of salary. With somewhat stagnant wage increases and the future of defined benefit pensions in question, it is all the more important to allow employees to take more control of their future. Lastly, what a great recruitment and retention tool for the district, to be able to brag about our great 403B program to perspective employees.
  8. These 3 are my least favorite financial pundits, with Kiyosaki being the worst IMO. All three have made far more money from their books, seminars, and endorsements, than from following their own questionable advice.
  9. I think that we will see a decline in the AUM model of financial advice and a move to more "fee only" type financial advice. New investors just need someone to explain what's available at their place of work and motivate them to get started. They don't need someone to handle their 403B contributions for 1-2% per year. Coworkers should help with this, or at the most maybe a one hour consultation with an honest fiduciary advisor. On the other end of the financial spectrum, your multi-millionaire investor doesn't want to shell out 10's of thousands in AUM fees when they just need a couple hours of consultation. The active manager model is bad, not just because of their AUM fees, but also because of the transaction fees and taxes that come along with the active management that they feel they must do to justify their fees. A double whammy against the uninformed investor!
  10. This is great news for investors. Early in my teaching career (early 90's) I was talked into contributing into an annuity product that I unfortunately can't remember the exact name of. I only put in about a $100 per check for about a year. I received a notice of a class action law suit against this company about a year later. It stated that the insurance company was being sued for falsely representing itself as an investment product. I signed up for the class action and got quite a bit of my contributions of the past year back. That would be great if the SEC investigation opens doors to keeping these annuities out of our schools and maybe even suing these companies on the basis of falsely representing themselves.
  11. I bought "Teach and Retire Rich" used on Amazon. I highly recommend it also. I don't remember what I paid but it was fairly inexpensive. As an extra special bonus the inside cover appears to have an authentic note and signature from Dan Otter dated 2008. Does this greatly increase the value of the book?🙂
  12. "Have you been listening to Dave Ramsey?" I'm chuckling at that response. These guys are friendly and personable, but make no mistake they are ripping you off. The standard to sell insurance is very low. He is not acting in your best interest and none of his plans are cheaper than Fidelity or Vanguard.
  13. I once had about $75 in a 401K from a non-teaching summer job that I did years ago. They kept sending me statements, but I didn't do anything with it because I figured it wasn't worth hassling over such a small amount, and that I would just wait and spend it at age 59.5 and buy a nice dinner or something. A couple years ago, I guess they wanted to clean things up, and they asked me to either cash it out (taking an IRS penalty) or roll it over to a different account. I did exchange it over to Vanguard, but for all the calls, paper work, and trips to the post office, it probably wasn't worth the 75 bucks. Your amounts are over a thousand, so I think this would definitely be worth the hassle of exchanging it to Vanguard.
  14. It's unfortunate that you didn't get enrolled when you thought you did. I don't mean to be blunt, but you should have checked your pay stub. This sounds like it was a 4% match of your contribution, but you never contributed any money, so there was nothing for them to match. Maybe I am misunderstanding.
  • Create New...